You are here


Document Information

Document Title:Drug and Alcohol Testing Results 2003 Annual Report
Number of Pages: 84
Download Now:
Adobe Acrobat Reader
pdf
Order Copies: This document is only available on-line.
KeyWords:alcohol testing, drug testing, random testing, safety-sensitive, return to duty, rates
Main Category: Drug and Alcohol, DAMIS Annual Reports
Organization: U.S. Department of Transportation
Research and Innovative Technology Administration
John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
55 Broadway
Cambridge, MA 02142-1093
Organization Report Number: DOT-VNTSC-FTA-05-06
Sponsor Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration
Office of Safety and Security
Washington, DC 20590
Sponsor Agency Report Number: FTA-MA-26-0054-06-1
Description: This is the eighth annual report of the results of the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Drug and Alcohol Testing Program. The report summarizes the new reporting requirements introduced for calendar year 2003, the requirements of the overall drug and alcohol testing program (the revised CFR Part 40 and CFR Part 655), the results from the data reported for 2003, and the random drug and alcohol violation rates (the percentage of persons selected for a random test who produced a positive specimen or refused to take the test) for calendar years 1996 through 2003.

The results of drug tests-for marijuana, cocaine, phencyclidine (PCP), opiates, and amphetamines-are compared with the results of alcohol tests for the various types of required tests. Statistics are presented for random, post-accident, reasonable suspicion, and pre-employment tests combined and for each individual test type. Those test results are further compared by employer type (transit agencies and contractors), employer size (large, small, and rural), employee category, FTA region, and the drug type.

Statistics on employees returned to duty and results of return to duty tests and follow-up tests are presented separately from results of the other four test types because return-to-duty tests and follow-up tests represent a different segment of the test population and not all employers offer rehabilitation.
Submit Feedback >